§ Search & Seizure ▸ Plain View & Plain Smell
Plain View & Plain Smell
If you are lawfully present and the incriminating nature is immediately apparent, plain view lets you seize it. Smell is the harder question.
Cases
- Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987)
- Dow Chemical Co. v. United States, 476 U.S. 227 (1986)
- Harris v. US, 390 U.S. 234 (1968)
- Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990)
- Illinois v. Andreas, 463 U.S. 765 (1983)
- Maryland v. Macon, 472 U.S. 463 (1985)
- Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 (1993)
- Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 (1983)
- U.S. v. Downs, 151 F.3d 1301 (1998)
- United States v Guzman, 48 F. App'x 158 (2002)
- United States v. Lee, 274 U.S. 559 (1927)
- United States v. Lovell, 24 F.3d 239 (1988)
- US v. Grill, 46 F.4th 374 (2022)
- US v. Nielsen, 9 F.3d 1487 (1993)
- US v. Parker, 65 F.3d 178 (1995)
- Washington v. Chrisman, 455 U.S. 1 (1982)